Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 00:02

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Double Speak About NASA Science - NASA Watch
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Scientists discover a 33-foot Jurassic giant, twice as big as its cousin - Earth.com
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Aut explicabo sapiente quis consequuntur fuga consectetur fugit.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Mario Smash Football primed for Switch 2's growing GameCube library - Eurogamer
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
'Worst I've ever seen': Pest control company seeing big increase in calls for rats - 13wham.com
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Aut dolorem voluptates tempore maxime.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
NY retail worker safety law takes effect this week. Here’s what it does. - Gothamist